[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070802090008.GA1699@ff.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:00:08 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jason.wessel@...driver.com, amitkale@...syssoft.com,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > >>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
...
> > > >>>>>> net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'poll_controller'
...
> > > >>>>>> I think is because KGDBOE selects just NETPOLL.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> Looks like it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Select went and selected NETPOLL and NETPOLL_TRAP but things like
> > > >>>>> CONFIG_NETDEVICES and CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER remain unset. `select'
> > > >>>>> remains evil.
...
> > seems to select NET_POLL_CONTROLLER after selecting NETPOLL, but
> > still doesn't check for NETDEVICES dependency.
>
> That's odd. Adding Sam to the cc:.
Looks right, but after reading Andrew's opinion about select I'd be
astonished if he doesn't know this problem already.
>
> > > >> Now KGDBOE just selects NETPOLL and NETPOLL_TRAP.
> > > >> Adding 'select CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER' let kgdboe compiles but the question is does it work without any ethernet card ?
> > > >
> > > > Why kgdboe should care what netpoll needs? So, I hope, you are adding
> > > > this select under config NETPOLL. On the other hand, if NETPOLL should
> > > > depend on NET_POLL_CONTROLLER there is probably no reason to have them
> > > > both.
> > >
> > > NET_POLL_CONTROLLER has def_bool NETPOLL if NETDEVICES .
> > >
> > > Net peoples ping ?:)
>
> How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer?
Is there a new one or do you suggest possibility of abusing the
authority of the netpoll's author with such trifles...?!
BTW, I can't find any official meaning of def_bool, but it's name
suggests only default value, so logically it should be not enough
to assure NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y, and netpoll should use "depends",
"require" or "select" (IMHO more readable too), but on the other
hand this could be practially wrong...
>
> > OK, I wasn't right here: there is no visible reason for both in the
> > kernel code, but I can imagine there could be some external users of
> > NET_POLL_CONTROLLER without NETPOLL.
>
> I don't know of any. As far as I can tell at this point,
> NET_POLL_CONTROLLER == NETPOLL.
There are some notions about "other diagnostic tools" in some
net drivers, eg. 3c509.c, so there would be a little bit of
work if, after changing this, they really exist (and even if
not - maybe it's reasonable to save such possibility for the
future?).
Best regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists