[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1187009029.27916.107.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:43:49 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jbenc@...e.cz, flamingice@...rmilk.net, jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Net: mac80211, remove bitfields from struct
ieee80211_tx_packet_data
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 15:08 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_REQ_TX_STATUS)
> + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_REQ_TX_STATUS;
> + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_DO_NOT_ENCRYPT)
> + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_DO_NOT_ENCRYPT;
> + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_REQUEUE)
> + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_REQUEUE;
> + if (control->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_MGMT)
> + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_MGMT_IFACE;
This looks weird. Can't we just use the same flags?
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists