lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: optimize memset of 6 and 8 bytes On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily > be optimized into simple assignments without string instructions. so... question. Why are we doing this by hand? Wouldn't gcc just generate this code in the first place (when using __builtin_memset)? I very much suspect it would (and if some version doesn't.... we really ought to get that fixed) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists