netdev - Re: [PATCH] i386: optimize memset of 6 and 8 bytes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070817185452.5cbf60c4@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:54:52 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: optimize memset of 6 and 8 bytes

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily
> > be optimized into simple assignments without string instructions.
> 
> 
> so... question.
> Why are we doing this by hand? Wouldn't gcc just generate this code in
> the first place (when using __builtin_memset)? I very much suspect it
> would (and if some version doesn't.... we really ought to get that
> fixed)

i386 and x86_64 are not using __builtin_memset, as least from the
code that I see generated.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html