netdev - Re: [PATCH] improved xfrm_audit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187832557.15699.687.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:29:17 -0500
From:	Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com, sgrubb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improved xfrm_audit_log() patch

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 12:51 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > Looks good, applied to net-2.6.24, thanks Joy.
> 
> Something is still buggered up in this patch, you can't add this local
> "audit_info" variable unconditionally to these functions, and
> alternatively you also can't add a bunch of ifdefs to xfrm_user.c to
> cover it up either.
> 
I wonder if I am subconsciously trying to break a record or 
something! My apologies as time is valuable. 

I mean to get this right. My rationale for using audit_info was to
reduce amount of arguments to xfrm_audit_log(). However, I now like
it better when I just called xfrm_audit_log(NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid, ...). User determines where/how to get loginuid and
secid and nothing happens when AUDIT not configured. But would make
xfrm_audit_log() have 7 arguments instead of 6.

My alternative is to remove xfrm_get_auditinfo() out of the 
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL and always fill in audit_info
regardless if AUDIT is configured or not. Less calls to
xfrm_audit_log() but perhaps unnecessary info when AUDIT 
not configured.

Would first solution be acceptable?

Joy   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html