[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1189017588.6670.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:39:48 -0400
From: Jesse Huang <jesse@...lus.com.tw>
To: jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse@...lus.com.tw
Subject: Re: [patch 02/18] sundance: PHY address form 0, only for device I
D 0x0200 (IP100A) (20070605)
Dear Jeff:
We found current sundance.c in kernel 2.6.22 is working fine for IP100A.
We need not to modify following codes:
> - for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
> + if (sundance_pci_tbl[np->chip_id].device == 0x0200)
> + phy = 0;
> + else
> + phy = 1;
> + for (; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
Current code will find IP100A at 0 when phy was equ to 32.
for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
int phyx = phy & 0x1f;
int mii_status = mdio_read(dev, phyx, MII_BMSR);
if (mii_status != 0xffff && mii_status != 0x0000) {
np->phys[phy_idx++] = phyx;
np->mii_if.advertising = mdio_read(dev, phyx, MII_ADVERTISE);
if ((mii_status & 0x0040) == 0)
np->mii_preamble_required++;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: MII PHY found at address %d, status "
"0x%4.4x advertising %4.4x.\n",
dev->name, phyx, mii_status, np->mii_if.advertising);
}
}
So, we hope you can drop this patch "[patch 02/18] sundance: PHY address
form 0, only for device I D 0x0200 (IP100A) (20070605)"
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jesse Huang
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jeff@...zik.org]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 6:43 PM
To: ¶À«Ø¿³-Jesse
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/18] sundance: PHY address form 0, only for device
I D 0x0200 (IP100A) (20070605)
¶À«Ø¿³-Jesse wrote:
> +++ a/drivers/net/sundance.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,11 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> * It seems some phys doesn't deal well with address 0 being
> accessed
> * first, so leave address zero to the end of the loop (32 &
31).
> */
> - for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
> + if (sundance_pci_tbl[np->chip_id].device == 0x0200)
> + phy = 0;
> + else
> + phy = 1;
> + for (; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
As I noted in the last email, this patch still has a bug:
In the above loop code being modified, you need to change two things:
1) Initial loop value
2) Loop terminating condition
Your patch only performs change #1.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists