netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46E1C037.1090507@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:18:47 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC:	David Acker <dacker@...net.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA

Kok, Auke wrote:
> David Acker wrote:
>> Kok, Auke wrote:
>>> first impressions are not good: pings are erratic and shoot up to 3 
>>> seconds. In an overnight stress test, the receive unit went offline and 
>>> never came back up (TX still working).
>>>
>>> it sounds like something in the logic is suspending the ru too much, but 
>>> I haven't had time to look deeply into the code yet.
>> I don't have an e100 enabled x86 box handy but I will look into getting one setup.
>>
>> I just applied this patch to my PXA255 based system http://www.compulab.co.il/x255/html/x255-cm-datasheet.htm .
>> It is running 2.6.18.4 plus compulab patches plus some hostap patches plus the e100 patch.  I get:
>>
>> pings going from the embedded system to a desktop machine.
>> 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 98996ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.239/0.728/1.512/0.571 ms
>>
>> Pings going the from the desktop machine to the embedded system
>> 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99217ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.206/0.876/1.473/0.575 ms
> 
> ok, I just got a note from our lab saying that that particular system has the 
> freak ping times even without your patch applied 8)
> 
> ignoring the ping issue, we still have the ru offline, but that could have 
> possibly been caused by whatever is causing this ping issue... More testing is 
> needed, and I'll try to find a system without the ping issue here first.

update: Emil reports that the unit with the RU hang did not have bad ping times 
to begin with, pointing to a problem with the patch for sure now...

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html