netdev - error(s) in 2.6.23-rc5 bonding.txt ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46E1CA81.6050808@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:02:41 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: error(s) in 2.6.23-rc5 bonding.txt ?

I was perusing Documentation/networking/bonding.txt in a 2.6.23-rc5 tree 
and came across the following discussing the round-robin scheduling:

>         Note that this out of order delivery occurs when both the
>         sending and receiving systems are utilizing a multiple
>         interface bond.  Consider a configuration in which a
>         balance-rr bond feeds into a single higher capacity network
>         channel (e.g., multiple 100Mb/sec ethernets feeding a single
>         gigabit ethernet via an etherchannel capable switch).  In this
>         configuration, traffic sent from the multiple 100Mb devices to
>         a destination connected to the gigabit device will not see
>         packets out of order.  

My first reaction was that this was incorrect - it didn't matter if the 
receiver was using a single link or not because the packets flowing 
across the multiple 100Mb links could hit the intermediate device out of 
order and so stay that way across the GbE link.

Before I go and patch-out that text I thought I'd double check.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html