lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:18:12 +0800 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:04:41PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > disabling BH would make it more symmetric to the way we handle > egress. I couldnt reproduce the issue, but this should hopefully resolve > it. > Christian, can you test with this patch? Jamal, it's the police_lock that we need to make _bh. The ingress_lock is already _bh because of the spin_lock_bh that directly precedes it. Oh and I think the same thing applies for the other actions too. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists