netdev - Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE mismatch with man page & comments.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greearb@...delatech.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE mismatch with man page & comments.

From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:45:14 -0700

> According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be able to pass a zero
> optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
 ...
> 
> However, earlier in that method it returns -EINVAL if optlen is < sizeof(int).
> 
> The man page has comments similar to that in the code above.

Yes, the comment definitely does not match the code and
should be fixed one way or the other.

I'll do some code history research to try and figure out
if this optlen==0 case ever worked properly.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html