lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: RFC: possible NAPI improvements to reduce interrupt rates for
 low traffic rates

From: James Chapman <>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:16:00 +0100

> First, do we need to encourage consistency in NAPI poll drivers? A
> survey of current NAPI drivers shows different strategies being used
> in their poll(). Some such as r8169 do the napi_complete() if poll()
> does less work than their allowed budget. Others such as e100 and
> tg3 do napi_complete() only if they do no work at all.

Actually, I want to clarify this situation.  In reality these
drivers are more consistent than different.

For some chips the cheapest way to figure out if there is more
RX work is simply to see if the amount of work processed is
less than "budget".  It's too expensive to recheck the hardware.

On some chips like tg3, it's extremely cheap to see if new work
arrived between the completion of processing the RX queue and
the NAPI completion check, so they do it.

But logically they are testing the same exact high level thing.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists