netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:13:02 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.

Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> writes:

> [snip]
>
>> @@ -25,6 +26,3 @@ clean:
>>  
>>  LDLIBS	+= -ldl
>>  LDFLAGS	+= -Wl,-export-dynamic
>> -
>> -%.so: %.c
>> -	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared $< -o $@
>
> %) How do we get the .so file then?

The code was built into iproute2, so we don't need the .so file.
That rule does not work on arch/x86_64 so I had to do something
and the easiest was to simply compile the code in.  Like Patrick
did with his recent VLAN support.

The usefulness of a .so file seems to be distributing the code
outside of /bin/ip.  Although I think we currently have some issues with
mixed 32bit and 64bit systems because we have "/usr/lib/ip/link_*.so"
hard coded.

A .so file always seems to override the compiled in version so I don't
think we loose any flexibility on that front.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html