[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070913123025.0077d421@oldman>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:30:25 +0200
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:13:02 -0600
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> writes:
>
> > [snip]
> >
> >> @@ -25,6 +26,3 @@ clean:
> >>
> >> LDLIBS += -ldl
> >> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-export-dynamic
> >> -
> >> -%.so: %.c
> >> - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared $< -o $@
> >
> > %) How do we get the .so file then?
>
> The code was built into iproute2, so we don't need the .so file.
> That rule does not work on arch/x86_64 so I had to do something
> and the easiest was to simply compile the code in. Like Patrick
> did with his recent VLAN support.
>
> The usefulness of a .so file seems to be distributing the code
> outside of /bin/ip. Although I think we currently have some issues with
> mixed 32bit and 64bit systems because we have "/usr/lib/ip/link_*.so"
> hard coded.
>
> A .so file always seems to override the compiled in version so I don't
> think we loose any flexibility on that front.
>
> Eric
Fixing the 64 bit library path is on my to fix list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists