netdev - Re: e1000 driver and samba

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46EEC152.8090005@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:02:58 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	L F <lfabio.linux@...il.com>, James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 driver and samba

Kok, Auke wrote:
> L F wrote:
> 
>>>>>>tx_deferred_ok: 486
>>>
>>>this one I wonder about, and might cause delays, I'll have to look
>>>up what it exactly could implicate though.
>>
>>Please do and let me know. samba 3.0.26 helped, but the issue is
>>still there.
> 
> 
> ok, from the spec: tx_deferred_ok is what is in the DC stats register. DC stands
> for "Deferred Count". This initially is meant to track how often the TX unit cannot
> send because the medium is busy in a Half-Duplex link state.
> 
> To me it suggests that your speed is not full-duplex. Check `ethtool eth0` output
> and see if your link is full duplex or not. also check previous kernel messages
> and see what the e1000 driver posted there for link speed messages (as in "e1000:
>  Link is UP speed XXX duplex YYY")

Shouldn't there then have been at least _some_ collisions reported in 
the stats?  And perhaps some late collisions?

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html