[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46EECCD5.5090601@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:52:05 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: dlezcano@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:45:11 +0200
> dlezcano@...ibm.com wrote:
>
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
>>
>> Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
>> simple network device, and it removes the special case
>> single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
>> making maintenance easier.
>>
>
> What is before/after code and data size, does it make code smaller?
Interesting question, here are the results based on the same config file.
Without the patchset:
----------------------
vmlinux:
text data bss dec hex filename
2446606 188243 163840 2798689 2ab461 vmlinux
loopback.o
text data bss dec hex filename
417 1040 8 1465 5b9 drivers/net/loopback.o
With the patchset:
------------------
vmlinux:
text data bss dec hex filename
2446853 187187 163840 2797880 2ab138 ./vmlinux
loopback.o
text data bss dec hex filename
609 4 12 625 271 drivers/net/loopback.o
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists