lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:22:50 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <>
To:	Rick Jones <>
CC:	Steve Wise <>,,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <>,,
	Robert Olsson <>
Subject: Re: pktgen question

Rick Jones wrote:
>>> Perf-wise, you could clone the skbs up front, then deliver them to 
>>> the nic in a tight loop.  This would mitigate the added overhead 
>>> introduced by calling skb_clone() in the loop doing transmits...
>> That only works if you are sending a small number of skbs.  You can't 
>> pre-clone several minutes worth of 10Gbe traffic
>> with any normal amount of RAM.
> Does pktgen really need to allocate anything more than some smallish 
> fraction more than the depth of the driver's transmit queue?

If you want to send sustained high rates of traffic, for more than
just a trivial amount of time, then you either have to play the current
trick with the skb_get(), or you have to allocate a real packet each time
(maybe with skb_clone() or similar, but it's still more overhead than the skb_get
which only bumps a reference count.)

I see no other way, but if you can think of one, please let me know.


Ben Greear <>
Candela Technologies Inc

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists