lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:52:58 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <>
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <>,
	Jeff Garzik <>,
	David Miller <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TX batching

jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-24-09 at 00:00 -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> that's bad to begin with :) - please send those separately so I can fasttrack them
>> into e1000e and e1000 where applicable.
> Ive been CCing you ;-> Most of the changes are readability and
> reusability with the batching.
>> But yes, I'm very inclined to merge more features into e1000e than e1000. I intend
>> to put multiqueue support into e1000e, as *all* of the hardware that it will
>> support has multiple queues. Putting in any other performance feature like tx
>> batching would absolutely be interesting.
> I looked at the e1000e and it is very close to e1000 so i should be able
> to move the changes easily. Most importantly, can i kill LLTX?
> For tx batching, we have to wait to see how Dave wants to move forward;
> i will have the patches but it is not something you need to push until
> we see where that is going.

hmm, I though I already removed that, but now I see some remnants from that.

By all means, please send a separate patch for that!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists