[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070928161328.GB28246@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:13:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Upgrading 2.6.21.7->2.6.22.9 kills my network (sky2):
sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x402300 length 60
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:11:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> After upgrading my kernel from 2.6.21.7 to 2.6.22.9 my 88E8053 no longer
>>> works:
>>
>> Small update: 2.6.22.9 with sky2.c/sky2.h from 2.4.22.4 works without any
>> problems.
>
> Final update.
>
> Reverting this patch:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8c07a8e30ba8a2e0831da4b134202598435f8358
> solved my problem.
>
> I also found this one:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6532232cd3de79c852685823a9c52f723816d0a
>
> Could it go to a next -stable ASAP, please? It seems that 2.6.22.5-2.6.22.9
> kernels have broken sky2 if used with vlans. :( Such regression in a
> -stable kernel isn't nice. :(
So should we just apply the second patch? I'll let Stephen tell us what
we should do :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists