[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709281957330.24092@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:36:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Upgrading 2.6.21.7->2.6.22.9 kills my network (sky2):
sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x402300 length 60
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:11:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> After upgrading my kernel from 2.6.21.7 to 2.6.22.9 my 88E8053 no longer
>>>> works:
>>>
>>> Small update: 2.6.22.9 with sky2.c/sky2.h from 2.4.22.4 works without any
>>> problems.
>>
>> Final update.
>>
>> Reverting this patch:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8c07a8e30ba8a2e0831da4b134202598435f8358
>> solved my problem.
>>
>> I also found this one:
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6532232cd3de79c852685823a9c52f723816d0a
>>
>> Could it go to a next -stable ASAP, please? It seems that 2.6.22.5-2.6.22.9
>> kernels have broken sky2 if used with vlans. :( Such regression in a
>> -stable kernel isn't nice. :(
>
> So should we just apply the second patch? I'll let Stephen tell us what
> we should do :)
>
Second patch works for me, so IMHO yes. Forget to mention that earlier,
sorry. Ofcourse this should be the maintainer decision, this is only my
vote. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists