netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071001.222059.11266966.yoshfuji@st-paulia.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:20:59 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...paulia.net>
To:	gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

In article <200710011332.43657@...ip-the-willow> (at Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:32:43 +0100), Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk> says:

> [TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
> ---
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk)
>  			return;
>  		default:
>  			sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
> +			break;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))

NAK; it is not required at all.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html