netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:17:58 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:02:10PM +0100, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> Quoting Al Viro:
> |  On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:32:43PM +0100, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> |  > [TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement
> |  > 
> |  > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
> |  > ---
> |  > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> |  > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> |  > @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk)
> |  >  			return;
> |  >  		default:
> |  >  			sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
> |  > +			break;
> |  >  	}
> |  
> |  Huh?  Why on the Earth would that be a problem?
> |  
> |  
> Sorry what is your question?

Why the hell is $Subject a problem that warrants any patches whatsoever?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html