[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191244900.4378.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:21:40 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jagana@...ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, rick.jones2@...com, xma@...ibm.com,
gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
jeff@...zik.org, mchan@...adcom.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
On Mon, 2007-01-10 at 12:42 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > + while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(skbs)) != NULL)
> > + q->ops->requeue(skb, q);
>
>
> ->requeue queues at the head, so this looks like it would reverse
> the order of the skbs.
Excellent catch! thanks; i will fix.
As a side note: Any batching driver should _never_ have to requeue; if
it does it is buggy. And the non-batching ones if they ever requeue will
be a single packet, so not much reordering.
Thanks again Patrick.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists