lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:21:40 -0400 From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, krkumar2@...ibm.com, johnpol@....mipt.ru, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jagana@...ibm.com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, rick.jones2@...com, xma@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com, jeff@...zik.org, mchan@...adcom.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sri@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching On Mon, 2007-01-10 at 12:42 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > + while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(skbs)) != NULL) > > + q->ops->requeue(skb, q); > > > ->requeue queues at the head, so this looks like it would reverse > the order of the skbs. Excellent catch! thanks; i will fix. As a side note: Any batching driver should _never_ have to requeue; if it does it is buggy. And the non-batching ones if they ever requeue will be a single packet, so not much reordering. Thanks again Patrick. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists