[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47066C68.2010703@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:55:04 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ariel.Hendel@....com, greg.onufer@....com,
Ashley.Saulsbury@....com, Matheos.Worku@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Third (final?) release of Sun Neptune driver
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> some minor nits.
>
> Could this driver be split into more files. 8k lines per file
> is quite a lot. Although GCC might optimize it best this way :-)
gcc does optimize it better this way, but overall, it's maintainer's
preference. It's far easier for many to have everything in a single
file, when editing.
> David Miller schrieb:
>> +#define nr64(reg) readq(np->regs + (reg))
>> +#define nw64(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + (reg))
>> +
>> +#define nr64_mac(reg) readq(np->mac_regs + (reg))
>> +#define nw64_mac(reg, val) writeq((val), np->mac_regs + (reg))
>> +
>> +#define nr64_ipp(reg) readq(np->regs + np->ipp_off + (reg))
>> +#define nw64_ipp(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->ipp_off + (reg))
>> +
>> +#define nr64_pcs(reg) readq(np->regs + np->pcs_off + (reg))
>> +#define nw64_pcs(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->pcs_off + (reg))
>> +
>> +#define nr64_xpcs(reg) readq(np->regs + np->xpcs_off + (reg))
>> +#define nw64_xpcs(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->xpcs_off + (reg))
>
> Can these be static inline and get the "struct niu *np" passed?
We have to answer this every single time... :) it makes the code more
readable, and this is common practice all over the place.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists