netdev - RE: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:54:33 -0700
From:	"David Mack" <dmack@...iper.net>
To:	"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	"Herbert Xu" <herbert.xu@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<esandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?

Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really weird is that it
shows *two* kernel panics, one in  e100_poll and one in _list_add.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Jones [mailto:davej@...hat.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 10:26 AM
> To: Kok, Auke
> Cc: Herbert Xu; netdev@...r.kernel.org; esandeen@...hat.com; 
> David Mack
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>  > Herbert Xu wrote:
>  > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > >> The e1000 changes you reference above, is this the 
> changeset you mean?
>  > >>
>  > >> commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
>  > >> Author: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
>  > >> Date:   Fri Jun 1 10:22:39 2007 -0700
>  > >>
>  > >>     e1000: disable polling before registering netdevice
>  > > 
>  > > Yep.
>  > 
>  > this patch actually called napi_disable() in the probe 
> routine which was wrong,
>  > but e100 does not do that. Nonetheless e100 doesn't call 
> netif_carrier_off() and
>  > netif_stop_queue(), so to make e100 the same as e1000 we 
> should probably do this,
>  > see below.
>  > 
>  > Dave, can you see if this resolves the issue for you? If 
> so then we might want to
>  > push this to -stable.
>  
> Will do, thanks Auke.
> 
> Eric/David, the Fedora 8 RPM version 2.6.23-6.fc8 will have 
> this if you
> want to give it a shot too.  It'll be at
> http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/f7.92/ when it's done
> building in an hour or so.
> 
> 	Dave
> 
> -- 
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
> 

View attachment "capture.txt" of type "text/plain" (18055 bytes)