[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18190.61294.191189.193153@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:52:14 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 breaks powerpc mysteriously
Andrew Morton writes:
> arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.c:920:19: errno.h: No such file or directory
> arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.c:921:18: slab.h: No such file or directory
> arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.c:922:21: vmalloc.h: No such file or directory
We used to have our own copies of inflate.c etc. for the zImage
wrapper code to use under arch/powerpc/boot. Then someone said "why
do we have two copies of these files?" and did a patch to make the
build process copy the files from lib/zlib_inflate over and compile
them. (We can't just use the compiled .o files from lib/zlib_inflate
because the wrapper is 32-bit whereas the kernel is often 64-bit.)
Now it seems someone has made changes to the lib/zlib_inflate versions
that are OK in the context of the kernel but not in the zImage (which
is a separate program). Avoiding this kind of breakage was the reason
why I made arch/powerpc/boot have its own copies originally.
So Andrew, what do you think is better - arch/powerpc/boot having its
own copies of the zlib_inflate stuff, or #ifdefs of some kind in
lib/zlib_inflate/*.c?
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists