lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4710901F.8010206@colorfullife.com> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:30:07 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com> To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> CC: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>, nedev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I think the scenario you outline is an illustration of the approach's > fragility: disable_irq() is a heavy hammer that originated with INTx, > and it relies on a chip-specific disable method (kernel/irq/manage.c) > that practically guarantees behavior will vary across MSI/INTx/etc. > I checked the code: IRQ_DISABLE is implemented in software, i.e. handle_level_irq() only calls handle_IRQ_event() [and then the nic irq handler] if IRQ_DISABLE is not set. OTHO: The last trace looks as if nv_do_nic_poll() is interrupted by an irq. Perhaps something corrupts dev->irq? The irq is requested with request_irq(np->pci_dev->irq, handler, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev) and disabled with disable_irq_lockdep(dev->irq); Someone around with a MSI capable board? The forcedeth driver does dev->irq = pci_dev->irq in nv_probe(), especially before pci_enable_msi(). Does pci_enable_msi() change pci_dev->irq? Then we would disable the wrong interrupt.... -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists