[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440710141615g60fb9775oba590deb1a9fabde@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:15:46 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: "Manfred Spraul" <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Ayaz Abdulla" <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
nedev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq
On 10/14/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:15 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > On 10/13/07, Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Someone around with a MSI capable board? The forcedeth driver does
> > >> dev->irq = pci_dev->irq
> > >> in nv_probe(), especially before pci_enable_msi().
> > >> Does pci_enable_msi() change pci_dev->irq? Then we would disable the
> > >> wrong interrupt....
> > >>
> > >
> > > the request_irq==>setup_irq will make dev->irq = pci_dev->irq.
> > >
> > >
> > Where is that?
> > Otherwise I would propose the attached patch. My board is not
> > MSI-capable, thus I can't test it myself.
>
> Why not just copy pcidev->irq to dev->irq once ?
it seems e1000 is using np->pci_dev->irq directly too.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists