[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1192456665.4336.57.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:57:45 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/10] [NET]: Avoid unnecessary cloning for ingress
filtering
On Sun, 2007-14-10 at 06:49 -0400, jamal wrote:
> Once this patchset makes
> it into net-2.6.24 i can do testing on my laptop and provide you any
> further feedback.
Works on all 4 tests i tried out on net-2.6[1]. GoodStuff Herbert.
Herbert, please look at the comment i sent on the clone vs copy.
Also, iirc this started as a netfilter optimization thing starting with
tail-calls - can someone (Patrick?) clue me how it helps in that
optimization aspect?
cheers,
jamal
[1] Didnt try any ipt action, will when i get the chance again. Heres
test 18b):
---
Window1) tc qdisc del dev lo ingress
Window1) tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
Window1) ifconfig dummy0 up
Window1) tcpdump -n -i lo -x -e -t &
Window2) tcpdump -n -i dummy0 -x -e -t &
Window1) tc filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match ip dst 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:2 \
action pedit munge offset 0 u32 clear pipe \
action mirred egress mirror dev dummy0
Window2) ping -c 1 127.0.0.1
Ping will fail since we are clearing first 4 byte of ip header.
Window1 will show the packet as seen on incoming by lo; the first few
bytes look like:
----
4500 0054 0000 4000 4001 3ca7 7f00 0001
----
Window2 will show the 4 bytes zeroed out as requested of pedit (and as
seen on dummy0)
---
0000 0000 0000 4000 4001 3ca7 7f00 0001
---------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists