[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:51:59 -0700
From: "David Mack" <dmack@...iper.net>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<esandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
> To: Herbert Xu
> Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> esandeen@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
> >> Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
> weird is that it
> >> shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
> >
> > Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
> > need to apply the same fix that was done for e1000.
>
> I feared that. its not the same as that commit that floated
> around in this thread
> and involves some reorganization in the init/probe code, so
> it's a bit more
> involved than just a few lines. I'll need a little bit of
> time to generate this fix.
>
> Auke
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists