[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:59:59 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
CC: David Mack <dmack@...iper.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, esandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
David Mack wrote:
> It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
> 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
>
> Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
Auke
>
> Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
>> To: Herbert Xu
>> Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
>> esandeen@...hat.com
>> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>>
>> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
>>>> Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
>> weird is that it
>>>> shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
>>> Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
>>> need to apply the same fix that was done for e1000.
>> I feared that. its not the same as that commit that floated
>> around in this thread
>> and involves some reorganization in the init/probe code, so
>> it's a bit more
>> involved than just a few lines. I'll need a little bit of
>> time to generate this fix.
>>
>> Auke
>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists