netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/8] [MV643XX_ETH] Move ethernet register definitions into private header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071019125654.GA11495@xyzzy.farnsworth.org>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:56:54 -0700
From:	"Dale Farnsworth" <dale@...nsworth.org>
To:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...vell.com>,
	Tzachi Perelstein <tzachi@...vell.com>,
	Manas Saksena <msaksena@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] [MV643XX_ETH] Move ethernet register definitions into private header

On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Isn't it a little too confusing to have two headers with the same name,
> > one in drivers/net and one in include/linux?
> 
> Perhaps we can fold the drivers/net one into drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c?
> Since nothing else includes drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.h anyway, there's
> not much point in having it separate.

Sounds good to me.  Please add a patch to do so.

-Dale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html