[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710191345020.13279@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:57:33 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> But then... your patch seems to make it possible, because it enables
> irq to the initial state of the counter. Of course, this could happen
> on closing only.
That's because free_irq() does not disable the interrupt in the correct
manner. The scenario is more or less like this:
phy_interrupt() [depth == 0]
disable_irq()
depth++; status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
...
free_irq() [depth == 1]
status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
...
phy_change() [depth == 1]
enable_irq()
depth--; status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
oops!
Now if free_irq() correctly incremented the depth counter, then the last
enable_irq() would still decrement it, but with its initial value of 2 it
would not change the status to reenable the line.
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists