[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270168520B@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:39:12 -0700
From: "Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1" <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <jgarzik@...ox.com>, "Li Yang-r58472" <LeoLi@...escale.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] ucc_geth: Eliminate compile warnings
Hello David
> It only kills the warning on 32-bit systems, the cast is wrong
> either way.
I'm not aware of the QE being present on any 64-bit PowerPC. However,
porting the entire driver to a 64-bit platform is an exercise in itself
as many other things would need tweaking the QE hardware itself. But
that's an orthogonal issue. For now I just want to fix that warning.
>
> > ugeth->tx_bd_ring_offset[j] =
> > - kmalloc((u32) (length + align),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > + (u32)kmalloc(length + align,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > if (ugeth->tx_bd_ring_offset[j] != 0)
> > ugeth->p_tx_bd_ring[j] =
>
> Pointers can be up to "unsigned long" in size, therefore that
> is the minimal amount of storage you need to store them into
> if they are needed in integer form for some reason.
>
> Any cast from pointer to integer like this is a huge red flag.
Agreed, but again, I'm not trying to fix the entire driver or to port it
to a different architecture.
For the current situation, 32-bit QE, 32-bit PowerPC, do you find the
patch acceptable?
Cheers,
Emil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists