[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729FA78.5040702@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:10:32 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page
David Miller wrote:
> Instead of answering your questions, I'm going to show you
> how to avoid having to do any of this cache flushing crap :-)
>
> You can avoid having to flush anything as long as the virtual
> addresses on the kernel side are modulo SHMLBA the virtual addresses
> on the userland side.
>
> We have some (decidedly awkward) mechanisms to try and achieve
> this in the kernel, but they are cumbersome and not air tight.
>
> Instead, I would recommend simply that you access the ring
> buffer directly in userspace. This avoids all of the cache
> aliasing issues.
>
> Yes, this means you have to do the ring buffer accesses in
> the context of the user, but it simplifies so much that I think
> it'd be worth it.
I'm probably misunderstanding your suggestion because of my
limited mm knowledge, are you suggesting to do something like
this:
setsockopt(RX_RING, ...):
Allocate ring using get_user_pages, return address to user
tpacket_rcv/netlink_unicast/netlink_broadcast:
for each receiver:
switch_mm(...)
copy data to ring
switch_mm(original mm)
Would this work in softirq context?
> Another option is to use the "copy_to_user_page()" and
> "copy_from_user_page()" interfaces which will do all of
> the necessary cache flushing for you.
>
> Actually it might be nice to convert AF_PACKET's mmap() code
> over to using those things.
That would also require to do the copy in the context of
the user, right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists