[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071101162757.GA18124@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:27:57 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:10:32PM +0100, Patrick McHardy (kaber@...sh.net) wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> >Instead of answering your questions, I'm going to show you
> >how to avoid having to do any of this cache flushing crap :-)
> >
> >You can avoid having to flush anything as long as the virtual
> >addresses on the kernel side are modulo SHMLBA the virtual addresses
> >on the userland side.
> >
> >We have some (decidedly awkward) mechanisms to try and achieve
> >this in the kernel, but they are cumbersome and not air tight.
> >
> >Instead, I would recommend simply that you access the ring
> >buffer directly in userspace. This avoids all of the cache
> >aliasing issues.
> >
> >Yes, this means you have to do the ring buffer accesses in
> >the context of the user, but it simplifies so much that I think
> >it'd be worth it.
>
>
> I'm probably misunderstanding your suggestion because of my
> limited mm knowledge, are you suggesting to do something like
> this:
>
> setsockopt(RX_RING, ...):
>
> Allocate ring using get_user_pages, return address to user
>
> tpacket_rcv/netlink_unicast/netlink_broadcast:
>
> for each receiver:
> switch_mm(...)
> copy data to ring
>
> switch_mm(original mm)
>
> Would this work in softirq context?
IIRC it requires disabled interrupts.
Probably David suggests to provide a pointer to allocated
in userspace buffer and use copy_to_user() and friends.
> >Another option is to use the "copy_to_user_page()" and
> >"copy_from_user_page()" interfaces which will do all of
> >the necessary cache flushing for you.
> >
> >Actually it might be nice to convert AF_PACKET's mmap() code
> >over to using those things.
>
>
> That would also require to do the copy in the context of
> the user, right?
Most of the time it is possible to call copy_to_user() in atomic
context, but it can fail, in which case some additional mechanism to
make a copy should be invented (workqueue, kthread, whatever you like :)
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists