[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1194046554.6369.20.camel@w-amax.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:35:54 -0700
From: Max Asbock <masbock@...ibm.com>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezert@...adcom.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
"jeff@...zik.org" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][BNX2X] .h files rewrite
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 22:17 +0200, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Please take a look and tell me if this is better than the last attempt.
>
> Main changes:
>
> * Rewrite of the init code:
> 1. Full rewrite of the generated code into something easier to read.
> 2. Removed zeroes by adding a zero command.
> 3. Big chucks of data are read by the chip using the DMA engine (instead of being written by the driver).
> 4. Gzipped more of the data.
>
> * Removed BE microcode, the swapping is done in the driver instead.
>
> * Rewrite of the HSI - broke it into three files bnx2x_hsi.h bnx2x_reg.h and bnx2x_fw_defs.h
>
> * Fixed SPARSE warnings.
>
> * Fixed all but three checkpatch.pl warnings. (IMHO they are false positives)
>
> The diff is against latest net-2.6.
>
> ftp link:
> ftp://Net_sys_anon@...1.broadcom.com/0001-bnx2x-h-file-rewrite.txt
>
> gzipped:
> ftp://Net_sys_anon@...1.broadcom.com/0001-bnx2x-h-file-rewrite.txt.gz
>
> (will also attache patch inline as reply to this email for review)
>
I built the newest bnx2x code against the net-2.6 kernel and ran a
number of stress tests with netperf and pktgen. I did not encounter any
errors.
Max
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists