[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711050001.03699.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 00:01:03 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
jarkao2@...pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash table
On Sunday 04 November 2007 22:56:21 David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> This makes a huge different as we have to set NR_CPUS to 4096
> in order to handle the cpu numbering of some UltraSPARC-IV
> machines.
Really? Hopefully you have a large enough stack then. There
are various users who put char str[NR_CPUS] on the stack
and a few other data structures also get incredibly big with
NR_CPUS arrays.
If it's for sparse cpu ids -- x86 handles those with an
translation array.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists