[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071104.203508.11916143.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:35:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ak@...e.de
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
jarkao2@...pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash
table
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:24:54 -0800 (PST)
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 00:01:03 +0100
>
> > If it's for sparse cpu ids -- x86 handles those with an
> > translation array.
>
> I would rather not do this, so much assembler code indexes straight
> into the per-cpu arrays.
Also, at current rates, I'll need to be able to support
4096 cpus for real not very long from now :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists