[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:40:14 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@...eleye.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David S Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Add the helper kernel_sock_shutdown()
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:03 -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:01:36PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> >
> > ...and fix a couple of bugs in the NBD, CIFS and OCFS2 socket handlers.
> >
> > Looking at the sock->op->shutdown() handlers, it looks as if all of them
> > take a SHUT_RD/SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR argument instead of the
> > RCV_SHUTDOWN/SEND_SHUTDOWN arguments.
> > Add a helper, and then define the SHUT_* enum to ensure that kernel users
> > of shutdown() don't get confused.
>
> That looks pretty good - any objection to naming the enum and using that
> name in the prototype for kernel_sock_shutdown() so it's even more obvious
> what type of shutdown argument this expects?
> --Mark
>
> --
> Mark Fasheh
> Senior Software Developer, Oracle
> mark.fasheh@...cle.com
That would be fine by me. How about the attached patch?
Cheers
Trond
Download attachment "linux-2.6.24-002-network_add_kernel_sock_shutdown.dif" of type "message/rfc822" (5282 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists