netdev - Re: [Resend][PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4738D238.8050105@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:22:48 -0500
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To:	"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4)

Hi Fred

Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Vlad,
> 
> Yes, I was breaking into multiples to ease review only.
> The "[PATCH 01/04] ... (5)" thread includes the complete
> reviewable and patchable final text in 4 files. In my
> next message, I will put the entire patchfile as inline
> text. (The "[PATCH 01/01] ... (5)" for 'iproute2' is
> already complete.)
> 

Ok, thanks for the explanation.  One questions is though why
do we need all the #if defines() throughout the file?

Most distros end up enabled almost everything anyway.  Looking
at the code, there is really nothing that needs a conditional.
Removing the conditionals would make things cleaner.

Just some of my thoughts.

Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html