[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071113041259.79c9a8c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:12:59 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: protasnb@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
>
> > Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?
>
> Do you feel that making us feel and look like shit helps?
>
That doesn't answer my question.
See, first we need to work out whether we have a problem. If we do this,
then we can then have a think about what to do about it.
I tried to convince the 2006 KS attendees that we have a problem and I
resoundingly failed. People seemed to think that we're doing OK.
But it appears that data such as this contradicts that belief.
This is not a minor matter. If the kernel _is_ slowly deteriorating then
this won't become readily apparent until it has been happening for a number
of years. By that stage there will be so much work to do to get us back to
an acceptable level that it will take a huge effort. And it will take a
long time after that for the kerel to get its reputation back.
So it is important that we catch deterioration *early* if it is happening.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists