lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071114.020706.219917088.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:07:06 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	protasnb@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +0000

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I've created linux-arm@...r.kernel.org
> 
> By doing so you've just said (implicitly) that you can not tolerate
> someone having a different opinion from your own.

I created a mailing list on a machine where I provide such services.

People can choose to use or not use the new list, it is their choice.

> While I accept *your* right to run *your* lists how you please, you
> are unable to accept *my* right to run *my* lists how I see fit.

I didn't tell you to take your list down or to run it in some other
way.  I didn't tell you to unsubscribe everyone and move them over
to the new list either.

I've provided an alternative, and people can pick and choose how they
see fit.  I'm letting natural selection run it's course.  Are you
able to cope with the fact that people might not want to use your
list any longer?  Perhaps that is what bugs you so much about my
giving people a alternative choice.

> So, when are you creating a replacement alsa-devel mailing list on
> vger?  That's also subscribers-only.

The operative term is "alternative" rather than "replacement".
Perhaps this misunderstanding is what you're so upset about.

And yes, that alsa list bugs the crap out of me too.  I'm more than
happy to provide an alternative for that one as well.

In fact, *poof*, there it is, linux-alsa@...r.kernel.org is there and
available for anyone who wants to use it.

Have a nice day Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ