[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115.152353.100893781.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: haoki@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, billfink@...dspring.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] udp: memory limitation by using udp_mem
From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:50:14 -0500
> +static inline int __ip_check_max_skb_pages(struct sock *sk, int size)
> +{
> + switch(sk->sk_protocol) {
> + case IPPROTO_UDP:
> + if (atomic_read(sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated) + size
> + > sk->sk_prot->sysctl_mem[0])
> + return -ENOBUFS;
> + /* Fall through */
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
This check misses UDPLITE, and this whole patch set is a designed in a
way that makes errors like this easy.
These special case checks are all over the place.
We don't have tests all over the place to see if a socket is TCP or
DCCP or SCTP in order to implement memory accounting there, because we
did it for connection oriented protocols cleanly, seperating things
via callbacks etc.
I would like to see the datagram memory accounting work similarly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists