[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071116021241.GD32509@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:12:42 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: haoki@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com, billfink@...dspring.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] udp: memory limitation by using udp_mem
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 03:23:53PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> We don't have tests all over the place to see if a socket is TCP or
> DCCP or SCTP in order to implement memory accounting there, because we
> did it for connection oriented protocols cleanly, seperating things
> via callbacks etc.
>
> I would like to see the datagram memory accounting work similarly.
I agree. In fact if we adopt some of the conventions used by
stream protocols such as the use of sk_forward_alloc, we should
be able to share code with TCP accounting too.
As it is every packet updates a global counter, using sk_forward_alloc
would mean that for most packets you only update a per-socket counter
which then would feed into the global counter at points such as socket
creation and destruction.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists