[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473C5ABC.5090204@sw.ru>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:42:04 +0300
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...ru>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, clg@...ibm.com,
benjamin.thery@...l.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] move unneeded data to initdata section
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org> writes:
>
>> This patch reverts Eric's commit 2b008b0a8e96b726c603c5e1a5a7a509b5f61e35
>>
>> It diets .text & .data section of the kernel if CONFIG_NET_NS is not set.
>> This is safe after list operations cleanup.
>
> Ok. This patch is technically safe because none of the touched
> code can live in a module and so we never touch the exit code path.
>
> However in the general case and as a code idiom this __net_initdata
> on struct pernet_operations is fundamentally horribly broken.
>
> Look at what happens if we use this idiom in module. There
> is only one definition of __initdata ".init.data". The module
> loader places all sections that begin with .init in a region of
> memory that will be discarded after module initialization.
nothing is discarded after module load. Though, I can be wrong. Could
you point me to the exact place?
Regards,
Den
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists