lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:00:56 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> CC: hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: HTB/HSFC shaping precision Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:43 AM: ... > If let's say i will limit bandwidth to 1Mbps, and will try to send packets > will 100Mbps speed, and will check which packets will be dropped. As a matter of fact, I wonder why you're so afraid of this dropping. It's usual method of auto-regulation e.g. for tcp. You've written latency isn't so much problem, then slightly overloading ISP's queue you'll always get full bandwidth, you've payed for. You didn't write what kind of traffic you service, but I doubt you can get rid of dropping everywhere: on your HTB etc. queues or on incoming traffic. > [...] This means something wrong or in my shaping tree configuration > (that time HTB) or in shaper code. Thats why i try to dig in this things more > deeply. Did you try to dig at this very nice HTB page?: http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ Regards, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists