[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1195660888907-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:01:28 +0200
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] [TCP] MTUprobe: Cleanup send queue check (no need to loop)
The original code has striking complexity to perform a query
which can be reduced to a very simple compare.
FIN seqno may be included to write_seq but it should not make
any significant difference here compared to skb->len which was
used previously. One won't end up there with SYN still queued.
Use of write_seq check guarantees that there's a valid skb in
send_head so I removed the extra check.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 7 +------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index ff22ce8..1822ce6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1315,12 +1315,7 @@ static int tcp_mtu_probe(struct sock *sk)
}
/* Have enough data in the send queue to probe? */
- len = 0;
- if ((skb = tcp_send_head(sk)) == NULL)
- return -1;
- while ((len += skb->len) < size_needed && !tcp_skb_is_last(sk, skb))
- skb = tcp_write_queue_next(sk, skb);
- if (len < size_needed)
+ if (tp->write_seq - tp->snd_nxt < size_needed)
return -1;
if (tp->snd_wnd < size_needed)
--
1.5.0.6
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists