[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47445BE3.6030708@psc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:25:07 -0500
From: John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] [TCP] MTUprobe: Cleanup send queue check (no
need to loop)
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The original code has striking complexity to perform a query
> which can be reduced to a very simple compare.
>
> FIN seqno may be included to write_seq but it should not make
> any significant difference here compared to skb->len which was
> used previously. One won't end up there with SYN still queued.
>
> Use of write_seq check guarantees that there's a valid skb in
> send_head so I removed the extra check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Acked-by: John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 7 +------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index ff22ce8..1822ce6 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -1315,12 +1315,7 @@ static int tcp_mtu_probe(struct sock *sk)
> }
>
> /* Have enough data in the send queue to probe? */
> - len = 0;
> - if ((skb = tcp_send_head(sk)) == NULL)
> - return -1;
> - while ((len += skb->len) < size_needed && !tcp_skb_is_last(sk, skb))
> - skb = tcp_write_queue_next(sk, skb);
> - if (len < size_needed)
> + if (tp->write_seq - tp->snd_nxt < size_needed)
> return -1;
>
> if (tp->snd_wnd < size_needed)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists