[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474EE86E.2010201@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:27:26 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: panther@...abit.hu
CC: Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@...ominate.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match
Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> Patrick McHardy írta:
>> Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
>>> Lutz Jaenicke írta:
>>>> Should iptables be allowed to read "/etc/iproute2/rt_ifgroup"?
>>>
>>> It would be good but cannot be used if a mask is set and only values
>>> less than 256 can be used with names.
>>
>>
>> Why 256? I can see no such limitation. For masks you could
>> simply allow to define masks in rt_ifgroup too and use
>> name/name or simply name/0xmask.
>
>
> 256 because it is the size of a static array (and I don't want allocate
> too much memory when other arrays such as the routing table names also
> have this size). In the current version I posted some minutes ago
> 0..2^32-1 can be used.
Its a hash. You can put as much in there as you like :)
> The syntax "name/0xmask" is simply too strange for me.
Then how about name/name with masks also defined in rt_ifgroup?
The same question applies for marks of course.
>>>> There is no standard API like getservbyname()...
>>>
>>> The code of iproute2 should be copied. If Patrick says it is ok,
>>> I'll write this part.
>>
>>
>> Of course. Please put the tab part somewhere common, I always
>> wanted to have named firewall marks shared with ip and tc
>> and I believe Balazs wanted that too :)
>
> Ok. Yes, he wants :)
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists