netdev - Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711291813200.13075@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:14:18 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	panther@...abit.hu, Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@...ominate.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match


On Nov 29 2007 17:27, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> The syntax "name/0xmask" is simply too strange for me.
>
> Then how about name/name with masks also defined in rt_ifgroup?
> The same question applies for marks of course.
>
I would find that confusing, which is why the new xt_TOS only
allows names when no /mask or a mask of /allbits is used.

>> > > > There is no standard API like getservbyname()...
>> > >
>> > > The code of iproute2 should be copied. If Patrick says it is ok,  I'll
>> > > write this part.
>> >
>> > Of course. Please put the tab part somewhere common, I always
>> > wanted to have named firewall marks shared with ip and tc
>> > and I believe Balazs wanted that too :)
>> 
>> Ok. Yes, he wants :)
>
So, we are going to see a librtnl?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html